Roughly half of SEO operations is the same work repeated on a schedule: crawling, diffing, reporting, briefing, prospecting. Five workflows remove most of it. Built in your own n8n or Make account, on your own keys, handed over with documentation — a fixed-price build, not a subscription.
I run these automations on my own work first. Monitoring 21 properties across nine countries by hand is not possible in a normal week — the only reason weekly technical audits run on all of them is that the crawling, diffing and alerting happen without me. Everything on this page is something I use before I sell it.
The commercial logic matters too: automating the repetitive half of delivery is why an audit from one consultant can cost less than an agency's while going deeper. The saving is real, and some of it belongs to you.
| Workflow | What it does | From |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly technical health monitor | Scheduled crawl into Sheets, diffed against last week, with an alert to Slack or email when something breaks. The change is what matters, not the snapshot. | €1,400 |
| Search Console decay detector | Finds pages losing clicks quarter on quarter, grouped by market and template, pushed straight to a task list. Catches slow bleeds nobody notices in a monthly report. | €1,400 |
| Localisation brief generator | Master article plus target market in; a full SEO brief out — keyword matrix, structure, internal links, FAQs. The backbone of multi-market content work. | €1,900 |
| Link prospecting pipeline | SERP and backlink exports in, qualification scoring, AI-drafted personalised opening lines, human approval gate, then send. Compresses the research, never the relationship. | €1,900 |
| AI-citation tracker | Your prompt set run on a schedule across several answer engines, mentions and citations logged, trend charted month over month. This is how AI visibility stops being a vibe. | €1,600 |
Ongoing monitoring on a workflow I have built, including maintenance when an API changes underneath it, runs from €150 a month. Entirely optional — the build works without it.
What you do manually now, how often, and which systems hold the data. Most of the value is deciding what not to automate — some manual steps are load-bearing judgement, and automating them costs you quality.
A written scope with the trigger, the steps, the outputs and the failure behaviour. Price fixed before anything is built.
Your n8n or Make workspace, your API keys, your data. I never hold your credentials after handover, and nothing routes through infrastructure I control.
Written documentation, a recorded walkthrough, and the changes people actually make — adding a site, changing a threshold, swapping a recipient — documented step by step.
No workflow that publishes content without a human approving it. These automations produce briefs, alerts, prospect lists and drafts for a person to review — that review step is the quality bar, and removing it is how sites get themselves in trouble. In YMYL categories it is not negotiable. AI assistance is disclosed in my terms.
If your team would rather learn to build these than buy them, I run a half-day workshop on AI-assisted SEO workflows from €900. Your tools, your processes, your data — people leave with something working, not with slides.